The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
RSSfeed
Registered Users Posts: 3,810 ✭✭
During the Presidential and Congressional races, there’s something we’re not hearing enough about, energy and incentives. This is particularly important for renewable like solar and wind, but not because they’re seeking special treatment, they want equal treatment. One of the biggest issues with energy in the U.S. and renewable energy in particular is it has to compete with energy sources, like oil, gas, coal and nuclear, with long, long...
go to solarfeeds for the rest of this story>>>>>
More...
go to solarfeeds for the rest of this story>>>>>
More...
Comments
-
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
What we're really not hearing about is a cohesive national energy policy. Too big a project for politicians I guess. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not HavingCariboocoot wrote: »What we're really not hearing about is a cohesive national energy policy. Too big a project for politicians I guess.
-
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
Yup. You're right. You only have to worry about having no brakes on your car when it's time to stop. :roll: -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not HavingIt's too big and a problem with no apparent solution. The cornerstone of any long range energy policy is going to be having to get by with less, quite possibly a LOT less, and no politician wants to touch that. It will be forced upon us eventually by thermodynamics and other realities, and what we do (or not do) now will influence the severity of the change when it comes, but political expediency trumps rational thought every time. We'll just barrel along doing business as usual until we hit the wall.
Totally, completely agree! The tragic part is that the vast majority of voters cannot see beyond their noses on issues like this, have no interest in being educated on the subject, and that's who the politicians are catering to for votes. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Havingwaynefromnscanada wrote: »Totally, completely agree! The tragic part is that the vast majority of voters cannot see beyond their noses on issues like this, have no interest in being educated on the subject, and that's who the politicians are catering to for votes.
-
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not HavingIt's too big and a problem with no apparent solution. The cornerstone of any long range energy policy is going to be having to get by with less, quite possibly a LOT less, and no politician wants to touch that. It will be forced upon us eventually by thermodynamics and other realities, and what we do (or not do) now will influence the severity of the change when it comes, but political expediency trumps rational thought every time. We'll just barrel along doing business as usual until we hit the wall.
Absolutely agree! IMO, the wall (or cliff) is closer than most people realize.
Attachment not found. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
Niice one, I just love some political cartoons!
Did you notice the front wheels? There's no turning that thing!Home system 4000 watt (Evergreen) array standing, with 2 Midnite Classic Lites, Midnite E-panel, Magnum MS4024, Prosine 1800(now backup) and Exeltech 1100(former backup...lol), 660 ah 24v Forklift battery(now 10 years old). Off grid for 20 years (if I include 8 months on a bicycle).
- Assorted other systems, pieces and to many panels in the closet to not do more projects. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
Moved RSS thread to discussion section to avoid 90 day deletion.
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not HavingDid you notice the front wheels? There's no turning that thing!
Ha ha - great observation. Yep - this sucker's headed for the Seneca cliff. The only question is how hard the landing will be. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not Having
I think you have to look at the side mentions, i.e. Romney mentioned energy in the ground and oh in a small voice wind and solar last night in the debate. R has indicated he would not support incentives for wind I do not know about solar, but have a good guess. -
Re: The Solar and Energy Debates We’re Not HavingShadowcatcher wrote: »I think you have to look at the side mentions, i.e. Romney mentioned energy in the ground and oh in a small voice wind and solar last night in the debate. R has indicated he would not support incentives for wind I do not know about solar, but have a good guess.
NOW who's a job killer?
OK, OK, I'll stop.
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 888 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 426 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed