Magniwork

Re: Magniwork

gee, all that free power from a genny too. it must be solar gasoline.:roll: they must have overcome conversion losses to boot. sign me up as i want some free electric too.;) is the house included? it might go good with that bridge i bought.:D

Re: Magniwork

stephendv wrote: »

or to be put it another way: with this duck that lays golden eggs you can reduce your grocery bill by up to 50%!

Mmmm ... Roast Duck tonight


And, the link to the free sites they stole the plans from :
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/mromag.htm
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Magniwork
http://blog.mapawatt.com/2009/07/21/magniwork_perpetual_motion_scam/

Does this mean I just made $100 ?

Re: Magniwork

wow just gotta get me one mabe even 2.. it seems its the best thing since the Chev Corvair and almost equal to the Ford Edsel.
You sure all live in a great country to have such marvelous electricity saving devices.. But you not the first to get them thay in use on Jupiter nor forthe last 38 years..:roll:

NIEL that cheque you sent me for the Golden Gate Bridge bounced.. returned "insufficient rubles" so the contract now invalid..

FOR sale Golden Gate Bridge . good price . send me cheque for $500 for pre contract approval..

Magniwork: Hoax or reality ?

Seen this ad: http://www.magniwork.com/?hop=0

Sounds too good to be true. Anybody dabble with this idea ?

Re: Magniwork

Oh.

That's some good marketing scam. One would think that all the energy they created for making the scam could have powered my home for a month.

I guess that's a different kind of renewable energy these days.

Re: Magniwork

BB. wrote: »

Simple answer--All zero point power, generates more power than it consumes, etc. that violate the laws of thermodynamics are scams. End of Story.

-Bill

Ah well...yes and no.

Yes, if they say it can be done today, it's a scam. The idea has been hijacked by scammers - but they didn't invent the idea...scientists did that.

http://www.space.com/peopleinterviews/clarke_believe_010227.html

Aldrin said, "To put this into a perspective where Arthur and I agree: It may take 200, 300 or 400 years, but it's going to take zero-point energy to get us to Alpha Centauri." Turning to Clarke, he added, "Correct?"

"I'm glad that Buzz has raised this rather controversial question," Clarke said. "A lot of my scientist friends are crazy to believe there's anything in this. It started with this so-called cold fusion business, which everybody laughed out of court. But I'm now convinced that there are new forms of energy, which we are tapping, and they make even nuclear energy look trivial in comparison. And when we control those energy sources, the universe will open up."



Mr. Clarke wrote a book, "The Songs of Distant Earth", ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Songs_of_Distant_Earth ) in which the ship Magellan utilized "vacuum energy". I recall that he stated in another place (I can't remember where, I think it may have been in an anthology, perhaps in the forward to the short story of the same name), that he got the idea for that energy source from the work of [I can't remember the name of the scientist].

Though I can't say for sure, I seem to recall he may have been referring to the Nobel Prize Winning work of Lee and Yang:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1957/


Anyway, the point I wish to make is that the idea of vacuum energy IS based on real science - we need to keep that in mind while trying to separate the wheat from the chaff:

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v61/i12/e125010