FlexNet DC was reporting wrong numbers
muddome
Registered Users Posts: 9 ✭
Actually It was doing exactly what it was setup to do. The problem is that the installer had connected the negative battery cable to the wrong side of the shunt. The attached photo shows it connected in the WRONG place. From Looking at it I can see how it would be an easy mistake to make. Some of the problems I was seeing was the mate saying charging at night, SOC numbers never going below 98%, power numbers not making any sense at all. I was pretty confused for a while because my SG readings and voltage just didn't jive with the mate display readings.
Attachment not found.
Attachment not found.
Comments
-
Re: FlexNet DC was reporting wrong numbers
A Installer that could make that mistake might ought to reconsider his / her vocation. Shunts are pretty much elementary 101.
Categories
- All Categories
- 229 Forum & Website
- 136 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 178 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 892 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 252 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.5K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2.1K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.6K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 428 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 655 Solar Water Pumping
- 816 Wind Power Generation
- 620 Energy Use & Conservation
- 622 Discussion Forums/Café
- 316 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 74 Construction
- 125 New Battery Technologies
- 107 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed