FlexNet DC was reporting wrong numbers
muddome
Registered Users Posts: 9 ✭
Actually It was doing exactly what it was setup to do. The problem is that the installer had connected the negative battery cable to the wrong side of the shunt. The attached photo shows it connected in the WRONG place. From Looking at it I can see how it would be an easy mistake to make. Some of the problems I was seeing was the mate saying charging at night, SOC numbers never going below 98%, power numbers not making any sense at all. I was pretty confused for a while because my SG readings and voltage just didn't jive with the mate display readings.
Attachment not found.
Attachment not found.
Comments
-
Re: FlexNet DC was reporting wrong numbers
A Installer that could make that mistake might ought to reconsider his / her vocation. Shunts are pretty much elementary 101.
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 888 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 426 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed