11th hour deal in California

Dave Angelini · September 2016

California public utility Imperial Irrigation District has reached a deal with the solar industry to extend net metering deals to between 1,200 and 1,300 customers, months after announcing it would not be taking new subscriptions, the Desert Sun reports.
Earlier this year, IID said it had reached a cap on the program, put in place by the state legislature, which limited net metering to 5% of its peak electricity demand, leaving more than a thousand customers in limbo with their solar arrays.
In a letter from IID District General Manager Kevin Kelley to state Senator Ben Hueso (D), the utility said it would extend net metering to customers who requested interconnection before April 1, and other sets of customers who had already taken steps to install panels.

Dive Insight:

Despite the decision by California regulators to preserve the current net metering rates until 2019 for investor-owned utilities, a public utility is caught in a debate over rooftop solar similar to those occurring in Arizona and Nevada.

The solar industry was trying to push a bill through the California legislature to extend IID's net metering program. But as the end of the session loomed, the utility agreed to reach a deal to allow more customers into the program.

The Desert Sun obtained a copy of IID's letter which explained the three sets of customers which will still be granted net metering deals: those who requested interconnection before April; those who applied for solar rebates by Feb. 5; and anyone who paid for a building permit before April 1.

According to the newspaper, those groups include more than 1,000 customers who previously would have been locked out of the program. The legislation which the solar industry supported would have allowed even more customers into the program, but the utility's compromise reaches more than 80% of customers who had been in the process of installing solar when IID hit the cap.

IID has previously had run-ins with solar advocates. In 2014, the utility reduced its incentives for small solar systems from $1.55/watt to $0.50/watt, prompting one installer to label the initiative the "worst solar rebate program on God's green earth."

Dive Insight:

As the California legislative session wound down, lawmakers voted on four separate bills aimed at giving a boost to energy storage.

AB 33 directs the CPUC to consider large-scale storage, specifically pumped hydro. The bill comes after the California ISO identified a need for fast-ramping, flexible resources to balance the grid and mitigate the potential impacts of over-generation from renewables.

In either a new or existing proceeding, the law would direct regulators to "assess the potential costs and benefits of all types of long duration bulk energy storage resources, including impacts to the transmission and distribution systems of location-specific long duration bulk energy storage resources."

While California already has an energy storage mandate, AB 2868 would allow utilities to develop an additional 500 MW of storage capacity "divided equally among the state’s three largest electrical corporations."

AB 1637 aims to double the Self-Generation Incentive Program. Earlier this summer regulators updated and revised the program, which currently provides $83 million a year through 2019 for behind-the-meter generation technologies including wind, fuel cells and energy storage.

And a final bill, AB 2861, directs the CPUC to establish a resolution process for interconnection disputes. The bill sets a goal of resolving disputes within 60 days, and would require the commission to appoint a "qualified electrical systems engineer with substantial interconnection expertise to advise the director of the energy division and to provide adequate commission staff to assist in resolving interconnection disputes."

As California moves toward higher penetrations of renewable energy and less reliance on traditional fossil generation, energy storage is expected to play an increasingly important role in maintaining reliability and power quality.

This spring, the California Public Utilities Commission approved expedited storage purchases for utilities near the Aliso Canyon gas leak outside Los Angeles, which depleted local gas supplies for generators. Already, SDG&E has announced a 150 MWh project for the region, and SCE unveiled a plan to retrofit an existing gas plant with 80 MWh of batteries.

PG&E also showed its increasing reliance on energy storage this summer when it announced it would retire the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant and replace it with zero-carbon resources, a task that will likely require it to store renewable power for use during peak demand hours.

Recommended Reading

California legislature: AB 33
California legislature: AB 2868
California legislature: AB 1637
California legislature: AB 2861

share

Lumisol · June 2017

I found it interesting the utilities are now making up the laws in California:
[b]The solar industry was trying to push a bill through the California legislature to extend IID's net metering program. But as the end of the session loomed, the utility agreed to reach a deal to allow more customers into the program.[/b]

Lumisol · June 2017

Marc Kurth · June 2017

Lumisol, Your posts would indicate that you do not perceive yourself as others see you.

Lumisol · June 2017

John Lennon said, Being honest may not get you many friends, but it will always get you the right ones.

Estragon · June 2017

@Lumisol

Your last quote is your best quote.

People here are welcoming you to a community, but being a friend by saying some of your comments may not be coming out the way you intend.

Lumisol · June 2017

Lennon's quotes always made sense to me.

westbranch · June 2017

As a kid, I was told! if you can't say something nice, don't say anything unless spoken to

, and it is rude to not answer at that point...

Lumisol · June 2017

Me too. I guess I consider humor to be in the nice category.

My humorous comment was at least on the topic of California, several posts here have tried to derail that by discussing personal matters and for that I apologize to the OP.

Estragon · June 2017

Fair enough, but like °c and ° f, not everyone may see everything as "small stuff". Asking what's meant by a comment could end up just feeding a troll. None of us wants that, right?

Lumisol · June 2017

BB. · June 2017

Please remember, our Host is funding this from their business--As a service to everyone interested in solar/conservation.

Just be be on our best behaviour as guests in their home.

And you can see why I do not attempt much in the way of off the wall humor here/online in places that I care about (unless a web forum goes "that way").

I do not get paid for this (and have never hit NAWS up for "free stuff"). I do it because I care about helping others--Just like folks helped me and my families when I was young.

Please dial it back a bit. Does not mean that we cannot disagree or feel strongly about things. Just be straight forward in the discussion about the points of issue.

-Bill

Lumisol · June 2017

I have never hit anyone up for free stuff either, I think it's unethical.

11th hour deal in California

Dive Insight:

Recommended Reading

Comments

Dive Insight:

Recommended Reading

Categories