ComBox won't send email
twistedtree
Solar Expert Posts: 135 ✭✭✭
I'm installing a Conext Combox and for some reason it's not sending emails. I have the TCP settings all set - IP address, gateway, DNS server, etc. And I have my smtp server name, user name, and password set with authentication enabled. I'm using port 587. All these same settings work fine from my laptop, but the Combox is not able to send a test email. Unfortunately it doesn't provide any error log or other feedback to suggest where the problem is. The only difference between the Combox settings and my laptop email is that my laptop uses SSL where that's not an option for the combox.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Comments
-
Who is your isp (internet service provider) or email host (Google or similar).
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
It's a hosting service that I've been using for years. Standard IMAP and SMTP services. For kicks I tried a different ISP's SMTP server and it works, so there is some difference between the SMTP services, and how each interacts with the ComBox. I'll let you know if I figure out anything new.
-
how about latency? Do a "tracert " from a com box...
KID #51B 4s 140W to 24V 900Ah C&D AGM
CL#29032 FW 2126/ 2073/ 2133 175A E-Panel WBjr, 3 x 4s 140W to 24V 900Ah C&D AGM
Cotek ST1500W 24V Inverter,OmniCharge 3024,
2 x Cisco WRT54GL i/c DD-WRT Rtr & Bridge,
Eu3/2/1000i Gens, 1680W & E-Panel/WBjr to come, CL #647 asleep
West Chilcotin, BC, Canada -
You might try a different port address:
https://www.fastmail.com/help/technical/ssltlsstarttls.html- SMTP uses port
25
, but SSL/TLS encrypted SMTP uses port465
.
-Bill
Near San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset - SMTP uses port
-
Problem solved, and it had nothing to do with the ComBox or the various SMTP servers that I have access to. The problem was/is that somewhere on my ISP's ISP's network there is an exposed 192.168.0.x subnet. Private networks, which 192.168.x.x are by definition, are supposed to always be hidden behind NAT or a proxy server. Yet there is an exposed one, and it happened to overlap with my local LAN address range. Duplicate IP address are a big problem, and I had been experiencing odd behavior for a couple of days. My ISP did all sorts of things trying to fix it, but nothing worked. Just last night, for kicks, I changed by LAN to a different subnet and tried pinging 192.168.0.1 and guess what? I got a response. That should never happen, and if I remember my IP stuff correctly, it's a major problem. Traceroute narrowed down where it is, but it's now in my ISP's hands. I've just gone and changed all my LAN gear permanently to a different subnet in the mean time, and for the first time in about 2 weeks it is working properly, including ComBox emails...
-
That is a pain... Although, I am trying to understand how "your internal network IP address" would leak out past the router. In theory (not that I am a network engineer) it would take a DNS mapping a URL/name to tell your router to map your IP address off of the router (i.e., www.xyz.com=>192.168.0.1) to an Internet address in the wild.
And, either the ISP assigned the address dynamically, or set it statically (or the customer set it statically).
Is there something on your router which would taken some IP address of your local network, off router?
-Bill
Near San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
It wasn't my address that leaked out - it was someone else's Assuming my rusty IP knowledge serves me correctly, you should never be able to ping or otherwise access a 192.168.x.x address other than your own. They should all be hidden behind proxy servers or NAT servers. When one is exposed, it creates a routing conflict with your own private IP network.
My internet service is via a very small outfit that has a network of point-to-point wifi stations, and based on Traceroute I think the exposed private network is in their network somewhere, but I'm not 100% sure. I'm coming to believe this outfit is in over their head and really doesn't know what they are doing as their service seems to have a lot of problem. DSL is just recently available in my area and I'm exploring getting that, but it means burying 2500' of conduit to get from the last pole to my house, so It's a big project.
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 888 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 425 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed