Wiring Question
shinybeast
Registered Users Posts: 2
Hi, I was reading HandyBob's Blog, The RV Battery Charging Puzzle and saw this in the 'Wiring' section...
"Big wire is cheap compared to the cost of panels, so err on the big side. You can either run big wire or install multiple smaller runs and split the panels up into several feeds. DO NOT tie the wires together at both ends. One wire will always have less resistance & carry more of the load. Find a voltage drop chart and limit your loss from the roof to the batteries to 3%."
What does he mean about not tying the wires together at both ends? I have a bunch of #10 wire and was thinking of pairing two 15 ft. lengths to make each run of wire from two parallel panels to charge controller. Is that not a good idea? Is that what he's talking about?
Thanks
"Big wire is cheap compared to the cost of panels, so err on the big side. You can either run big wire or install multiple smaller runs and split the panels up into several feeds. DO NOT tie the wires together at both ends. One wire will always have less resistance & carry more of the load. Find a voltage drop chart and limit your loss from the roof to the batteries to 3%."
What does he mean about not tying the wires together at both ends? I have a bunch of #10 wire and was thinking of pairing two 15 ft. lengths to make each run of wire from two parallel panels to charge controller. Is that not a good idea? Is that what he's talking about?
Thanks
Comments
-
Re: Wiring Questionshinybeast wrote: »Hi, I was reading HandyBob's Blog, The RV Battery Charging Puzzle and saw this in the 'Wiring' section...
"Big wire is cheap compared to the cost of panels, so err on the big side. You can either run big wire or install multiple smaller runs and split the panels up into several feeds. DO NOT tie the wires together at both ends. One wire will always have less resistance & carry more of the load. Find a voltage drop chart and limit your loss from the roof to the batteries to 3%."
What does he mean about not tying the wires together at both ends? I have a bunch of #10 wire and was thinking of pairing two 15 ft. lengths to make each run of wire from two parallel panels to charge controller. Is that not a good idea? Is that what he's talking about?
Thanks
Not well-written but the sentiment is correct: you can not parallel small wires to increase current-carrying capacity. An example would be connecting two strands of 14 AWG at the same terminal of the power source and the same terminal of the load in order to carry 30 Amps of current. Use one strand of 10 AWG instead.
So you either combine your panels 'on the roof' and run heavy gauge wire capable of handling the full current of all down to the charge controller, or you run individual sets of wires for the panels and combine at the charge controller. The latter is really messy and does not follow code of good conduct. -
Re: Wiring Question
Oh and because there are nit-pickers out there who think "moderator" is a synonym for "target" ....
NEC does allow paralleling of large gauge wire under certain conditions. -
Re: Wiring QuestionCariboocoot wrote: »Oh and because there are nit-pickers out there who think "moderator" is a synonym for "target" ....
NEC does allow paralleling of large gauge wire under certain conditions.
Is it not also permissible to parallel any other cable as long as it is to reduce voltage drop and not to increase ampacity? (The overcurrent protection must be for the thinnest cable in the parallel run).
--vtMaps4 X 235watt Samsung, Midnite ePanel, Outback VFX3524 FM60 & mate, 4 Interstate L16, trimetric, Honda eu2000i -
Re: Wiring QuestionIs it not also permissible to parallel any other cable as long as it is to reduce voltage drop and not to increase ampacity? (The overcurrent protection must be for the thinnest cable in the parallel run).
--vtMaps
The way I read it the answer is "no". I'm not sure they'd make the distinction between the two functions as far as paralleling is concerned.
This is not to say you won't find someone who will interpret it differently.
As far as code of good practice is concerned it's 'not on' either way (even with independent fusing of the lines).
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 888 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 426 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed