TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

Options
ywhic
ywhic Solar Expert Posts: 621 ✭✭
On the 1st day (Saturday) I was getting on the 1st screen (battery info screen per the MFG manual)

14.6V 7.6A 111 Watts 99% PWM

then it went to BULK and said 14.4V 7.8A 112w..

now today I got

14.4V 7.0A 101 Watts 99% PWM..

101w7amp.jpg

then it went to BULK..

I shut off the panels at the main breaker on the side of the combiner box just before the charge controller..

I got 20.7 V reading at that point.. (on the breaker just before the controller).. so that looks good.. 8)
(there is 8 feet of PV cable then the combiner box then 18" of 6 AWG wire to the controller)

I turned the PV solar breaker back on..

and immediately went to the diagnostics menu and it said solar panel volts 15.79 (example)..

So what number should I go with figuring my true panel watts??

Do I go by the battery info at 99% PWM from the controller meter (101 watts)??

Or do I mulitply that 15.79 * 7.0 amps I got today?? (which still works to 110 watts)

So confused as to what I should use as a guide to check effeceincy..

Someone said 110W to the battery would be sucky for 145w panel.. and it should be MUCH higher.. :cry:

Comments

  • Cariboocoot
    Cariboocoot Banned Posts: 17,615 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    Al, you're obsessing. That's not good.

    Panels do not put out anything like consistent or fixed power. It will vary all over depending on insolation, atmospheric conditions, temperature, and load requirements. The STC panel rating, the one on the specs that says "145 Watts", is obtained under ideal conditions in a laboratory. It is really nothing more than a relative number for comparing to other panels.

    Your 20.7 Volt reading is Voc; open circuit, nothing connected. It is meaningless except in terms of not exceeding a controller's input maximum. Panels source current, not Voltage. In one instance you have 7.6 Amps, in another 7.0. That's fine. If the load doesn't demand more or the insolation isn't perfect you won't see more. The Voltage will be <Vmp in according to losses through wiring and mainly what the battery pulls it down to.

    A brief review of charge stages:
    Bulk: maximum current from panels. Voltage rises to Absorb set point, current tapers off.
    Absorb: fixed Voltage at battery over time, current tapers off.
    Float: fixed Voltage lower than Absorb point, current remains relatively steady in accordance with load demands.

    If you keep on like this you're going to drive yourself crazy. The panels are fine; don't worry about them.
  • Dill
    Dill Solar Expert Posts: 170 ✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    agreed, hook 'em up and use them, and enjoy
  • Windsun
    Windsun Solar Expert Posts: 1,164 ✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    The only way to really see what the max panel charge rate is is to discharge your battery down pretty low, below 12 volts or so. You can also get a pretty fair idea by putting a heavy load on the batteries - by heavy I mean about 10-20% more than you would expect the panels to put out.
  • ywhic
    ywhic Solar Expert Posts: 621 ✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..
    A brief review of charge stages:
    Bulk: maximum current from panels. Voltage rises to Absorb set point, current tapers off.
    Absorb: fixed Voltage at battery over time, current tapers off.
    Float: fixed Voltage lower than Absorb point, current remains relatively steady in accordance with load demands.

    If you keep on like this you're going to drive yourself crazy. The panels are fine; don't worry about them.

    So when it says PWM on the meter that means Absorption stage correct?? (my book says PWM Absorption)

    Then why when it hits 99% PWM it then goes to BULK??

    I thought it was BULK then Absorption?? I did notice this changes with sun/shade/clouds..

    I did hook an automotive 12v bulb today to the unit and it still held up for 2 1/2 hours of run time..

    I was fine till a person on another forum made me think about it again.. (oh and I hate having ADHD)..

    Also.. I noted 20.7 when disconnected from the charge controller.. then once I kicked the breaker back on the voltage dropped to be 13.9 (which was the system/battey voltage at that moment).. does that mean the the controller was in fact regulating the INCOMING panel based on what the battery needed (it seemed that way)..??
  • Cariboocoot
    Cariboocoot Banned Posts: 17,615 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..
    ywhic wrote: »
    So when it says PWM on the meter that means Absorption stage correct?? (my book says PWM Absorption)

    "PWM" stands for Pulse Width Modulation. It is the type of charge controller and the way it functions; by turning on and off at different rates/intervals (very rapidly) to regulate the charge. In this case to keep the Voltage on the battery side at the Absorb set point.
    Then why when it hits 99% PWM it then goes to BULK??

    Operational fluke; it tries to pulse, can't hit the proper Voltage even at 99%, then goes into Bulk mode (100% ON) because it figures it needs it.
    I thought it was BULK then Absorption?? I did notice this changes with sun/shade/clouds..

    It is. However controllers can get confused about what stage they are supposed to be in and may take some time to sort itself out. Especially if someone turns the panels on and off while it's trying to charge.
    I did hook an automotive 12v bulb today to the unit and it still held up for 2 1/2 hours of run time..

    How much of a bulb? Did you see Windsun's comment? You really need to load it if you want to see the full potential.
    I was fine till a person on another forum made me think about it again.. (oh and I hate having ADHD)..

    Don't worry about that either. Confusion reigns!
    Also.. I noted 20.7 when disconnected from the charge controller.. then once I kicked the breaker back on the voltage dropped to be 13.9 (which was the system/battey voltage at that moment).. does that mean the the controller was in fact regulating the INCOMING panel based on what the battery needed (it seemed that way)..??

    Technically the controller doesn't regulate the panel Voltage; the load against the panels does. When in "ON" mode, a PWM controller is basically a straight-through connection between panels and battery. The panel Voltage gets pulled down to wherever the batteries are at. The current goes up to whatever the demand is. Panels are a current source and willingly let the Voltage go all over the place: you can have full current at anywhere from near zero Volts to Vmp. Voc will only be there at absolutely no load; the opposite of Isc which can only be read at dead short.

    During Absorb or Float you can read a steady Voltage on the output side of the controller, and an apparent steady (but higher) Voltage on the input side. If you could slow down time and watch it closely you'd see Voltage & current fluctuations on both sides; the current going off and on and the Voltage on the battery side elevating slightly when "on", the Voltage on the panel side jumping up and down between Voc and about Vmp.

    It is a hard thing to wrap your head around.
  • ywhic
    ywhic Solar Expert Posts: 621 ✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    Thanks.. I'll avoid that other EVIL forum..

    Back in my hole I go..
  • AlaskanYankee
    AlaskanYankee Registered Users Posts: 1
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    Good Day Everyone,

    I want to apologize first for jumping in this late, and a possible erroneous statement I might make lol! I am new to all this and am just trying to confirm what I have been reading. I was under the impression that you wanted to put the controller as close to the batteries as possible (no more than six feet)? Would that cause some of the confusing figures you were getting? Like I said, just confirming what I have read.

    Thank you


    Jeff
  • niel
    niel Solar Expert Posts: 10,300 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Re: TriStar TS-45 (PWM) Questions on numbers I'm getting..

    welcome jeff,
    you may have read my 1st reply to you, but i confused this tristar with the mppt model so i wiped that post. i don't have one of these particular controllers so i'll speak in generalities. anyway, the v drop posed by a large distance would still not cause the cc to go from absorb to bulk as to get to the absorb stage the battery has already been charged up for the most part and the absorb stage is a voltage regulated stage. the losses from cc to battery are a steady loss and would not cause the cc to go back into bulk, but could cause undercharging of the batteries. putting a large load to the battery could cause the cc to revert back to bulk though and the absorb stage of the charge never got completed