GT w/battery backup AC vs DC coupling
Comments
-
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingI think we ran into a poster here that wanted to use a Hybrid Inverter system with a utility that wanted to "pay" for all power generated and charge for all power used.
With the XW Hybrid--there is no simple place (that I am aware of) to install the power generated billing meter(s) and the power used meter(s).
-Bill
This sounds like it needs a line side tap on the grid side of the use meter to then separate the metering. -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingwisementrading wrote: »I got the attached file from Xantrex. I am not sure about the UL1741 Solar Guppy talked being a problem. I will have to look into finding a complaint ATS. I would think that it would be available if Xantrex had this drawing made unless it was for use outside the US.
I had not thought of having the ATS on the XW's output ... interesting configuration. Not sure how AC coupling and parallel WX-6048's will like this. Not shown in the diagram would be breakers and the GT inverters if you choose that route vs a gang of 6 DC charge controllers.
But yes, as the diagram is shown, that is code compliant and addresses another issue not brought up is how one would connect a 20kw solar to a residential 200 amp panel ( which you can't ), that's why this application is shown for the line side tap, which many a locality won't allow I have read. I should also note all the required breakers for the Charge controllers ( input and output ) and the Xw6048's ( input and output ) are not shown in the diagram and will require the BOS boxes. And if DC charge controllers are required you'll need fused combiners for each string of solar panels, allot of extra hardware -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingSolar Guppy wrote: »I had not thought of having the ATS on the XW's output ... interesting configuration. Not sure how AC coupling and parallel WX-6048's will like this. Not shown in the diagram would be breakers and the GT inverters if you choose that route vs a gang of 6 DC charge controllers.
But yes, as the diagram is shown, that is code compliant and addresses another issue not brought up is how one would connect a 20kw solar to a residential 200 amp panel ( which you can't ), that's why this application is shown for the line side tap, which many a locality won't allow I have read. I should also note all the required breakers for the Charge controllers ( input and output ) and the Xw6048's ( input and output ) are not shown in the diagram and will require the BOS boxes. And if DC charge controllers are required you'll need fused combiners for each string of solar panels, allot of extra hardware
Each mppt80-600 will only have one string attached to it. They come with fuse holders so only DC disconnects will be needed on the DC side. What makes you say 6 controllers? That would only give about 250V per string which on a hot day might stop harvest and at the very lest would drop the efficiency. Also, the mppt80-600 doesn't need de-rating up to 45C (113F). I have provided the diagram to my utilities, but they have not agreed to anything yet. Are there any national laws requiring them to allow grid connection? -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingSolar Guppy wrote: »
addresses another issue not brought up is how one would connect a 20kw solar to a residential 200 amp panel ( which you can't ),
What is the issue with 20KW into a 200 amp panel? 20kw is only like 83.3 amps at 240v. Also the panels will never be producing 20KW. 18kw would be the top after the loss from the scc and inverters and that is in a perfect world. -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingwisementrading wrote: »What is the issue with 20KW into a 200 amp panel? 20kw is only like 83.3 amps at 240v. Also the panels will never be producing 20KW. 18kw would be the top after the loss from the scc and inverters and that is in a perfect world.
The total input to the panel can only be 120% of the bus bar rating. On a 200 amp panel that is 240 amps. The combination of main breaker plus solar breaker can't exceed that total. If you are back feeding 80+ amps you will need a 100 amp back feed. This means the main breaker will need to be 140 amps or less.
Most likely the code guys are going to say that a 125 amp main breaker is not sufficient. -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingsolar_dave wrote: »The total input to the panel can only be 120% of the bus bar rating. On a 200 amp panel that is 240 amps. The combination of main breaker plus solar breaker can't exceed that total. If you are back feeding 80+ amps you will need a 100 amp back feed. This means the main breaker will need to be 140 amps or less.
Most likely the code guys are going to say that a 125 amp main breaker is not sufficient.
Can't I feed the inverter output into a breaker in another box before connecting it to the main panel? -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC coupling
I know this one all to well. I had to back feed with a 60amp breaker which would require a derate of my main breaker to 175 amps. Nix'd by the code guys because of my loads. Solution was to upgrade the service entrance to a 400 amp with dual 200 amp panels, one derated to 175 amps. This required a new wire pull from the utility transformer.
I didn't fight this too hard as I knew that within a couple months I was going to add another 125 amp sub panel for the office/shop building addition. It also allowed me to make the upgrade part of the solar add. -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingwisementrading wrote: »Each mppt80-600 will only have one string attached to it. They come with fuse holders so only DC disconnects will be needed on the DC side. What makes you say 6 controllers?
The 6 controllers was for the lower voltage 60-150. That's about $3000.00 of controllers
If you go with the HV unit, you still will need 5 of those, that's $6250.00 of controllers, based on Google/internet shown pricing of $1250 each
You need to design for about 350 amps on the batter side for a 20kw arraywisementrading wrote: »What is the issue with 20KW into a 200 amp panel? 20kw is only like 83.3 amps at 240v. Also the panels will never be producing 20KW. 18kw would be the top after the loss from the scc and inverters and that is in a perfect world.
The XW-6048's have a 12kw surge, so that's 36kw possible if you have three. Also, it not uncommon for solar to exceed name plate, either in cold weather or edge of cloud events. NEC requires a 25% buffer over nameplate rating. Then there is the 120% of the bus bar rating, which limits a typical 200 amp main panel to 40 amps backfeed -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingwisementrading wrote: »Can't I feed the inverter output into a breaker in another box before connecting it to the main panel?
It still will need to have a breaker in the panel as its entrance point. you will have 83amps to backfeed, that will require at least a 100 amp breaker, NEC required a 25% buffer but I suspect the 17 amps may be close enough for the code guys, but only a permit pull will confirm this. The only way to get the increase you need if you are backfeeding to a main panel is a service entrance upgrade. That will consist of either a 400 amp meter head with dual 200 amp panels with one panel derated to 150 (or maybe even a 125) amp grid side main breaker or a 400 amp panel with the breaker derated to some size under the 400 amp main breaker depending on what is available. You will need an AC combiner to join the 3 inverter outputs together with three breakers, one for each inverter then a backfeed line to the panel, usually only one backfeed breaker is allowed per panel. Generally they required a external meter head and a single box main disconnect as well in the line.
Sounds like the details here need to be worked out, a line side tap is much easier in this situation but many code jurisdictions will simply not allow them in a residential install. NEC does clearly spell out what this entails. This would simplify your metering requirements as well for measuring PV vs Usage by separating the meters completely. This is not trivial to obtain or get the utility to accept. It has its own set of hurdles to jump.
here is a link to a document from my utility about line side taps.
http://www.aps.com/_files/solarRenewable/TapGuide.pdf
And a page with all kinds of interconnection rules and requirements
http://www.aps.com/main/green/choice/choice_79.html -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingsolar_dave wrote: »
Sounds like the details here need to be worked out, a line side tap is much easier in this situation but many code jurisdictions will simply not allow them in a residential install. NEC does clearly spell out what this entails. This would simplify your metering requirements as well for measuring PV vs Usage by separating the meters completely. This is not trivial to obtain or get the utility to accept. It has its own set of hurdles to jump.
here is a link to a document from my utility about line side taps.
http://www.aps.com/_files/solarRenewable/TapGuide.pdf
And a page with all kinds of interconnection rules and requirements
http://www.aps.com/main/green/choice/choice_79.html
I think that a system with two meters has to have the supply side connection. I have attached a sample one line I got from TVA. Since this is the system they are using in my area I would think this will not be a problem in my case. However what I mean by a separate box would be a box with 2X 200 amp breakers up stream from the main panel. Would that not work? -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingSolar Guppy wrote: »The 6 controllers was for the lower voltage 60-150. That's about $3000.00 of controllers
If you go with the HV unit, you still will need 5 of those, that's $6250.00 of controllers, based on Google/internet shown pricing of $1250 each
You need to design for about 350 amps on the batter side for a 20kw array
Ok that sounds right. I know HV SCCs are pricy, but they will reduce both the wire size and the line loss, plus I will not have to have any string combiners. Can the lightning arresters be in the DC disconnect or would I have to have a box for those anyway? -
Re: GT w/battery backup AC vs DC couplingwisementrading wrote: »I think that a system with two meters has to have the supply side connection. I have attached a sample one line I got from TVA. Since this is the system they are using in my area I would think this will not be a problem in my case. However what I mean by a separate box would be a box with 2X 200 amp breakers up stream from the main panel. Would that not work?
Yeah since you are going to have 3 inverters you will need a combiner before the disconnect, a panel with like three 30-40amp breakers, one for each inverter. That drawing is correct.
Categories
- All Categories
- 221 Forum & Website
- 129 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 887 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 425 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed