FX80 observations
adas
Solar Expert Posts: 136 ✭✭✭✭✭
Aloha, I recorded the following voltage and amperage:
IN Volts 79V @ 26Amps = 2054W
Out Volts 26 @ 72 Amps = 1872W
Does this mean since the input wattage is 2054 and output wattage is 1872 that the loss in the controller is 2054 * 8.9% loss = 1872?
thanks
frank
IN Volts 79V @ 26Amps = 2054W
Out Volts 26 @ 72 Amps = 1872W
Does this mean since the input wattage is 2054 and output wattage is 1872 that the loss in the controller is 2054 * 8.9% loss = 1872?
thanks
frank
Comments
-
Re: FX80 observations
Yes, you are correct--within the accuracy of the equipment measuring the voltage/current...
Just playing games here, but assuming that there is some slop in accuracy and displayed digits--lets just assume that the Out/In voltage and current reading were a few tenths of a volt/amp the other direction:
IN Volts 78.6V @ 25.6Amps = 2,012 W
Out Volts 26.4v @ 72.4 Amps = 1,911 W
Out/In=95% efficiency...
Well withing the margin of error of the digits you supplied (assuming 1 volt / 1 amp accuracy).
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
Re: FX80 observations
Frank,
The calculated efficiency (~91%) looks low. The FM80’s published efficiency spec for an 83 V array at 2,000 W in is a bit over 95% (manual page 61).
As Bill suggests, higher resolution data values would be helpful. Also note that the FM80 meters are not lab grade devices, and they’re intended to provide a general indication of operational state. I believe the array input current value is calculated rather than measured (I need to verify this), and the controller’s battery voltmeter may need to be calibrated.
As an example of the above, I once used my old MX60’s display to calculate its indicated low-power efficiency at 88.2%. However, when I used external shunts, I found the efficiency to be 92.2%.
See: http://www.outbackpower.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=952&hilit=shunt
HTH,
Jim Goodnight
“crewzer”
OutBack Power Systems -
Re: FX80 observations
Aloha, Jim. yes they are not accurate at all. One FX80 says 28.2 and the other says 28.4....both on the same buss. also I told the measurments while the led was in motion and as you know the FX80 moves around much more than the MX60, so by the time I recorded in my mind the incoming voltage and amps, after I shift my eyes to the outgoing to get a mental picture of the reading it already changed.
***** so need two people to read symultaneously.
Frank -
Re: FX80 observationsAloha, Jim. ....after I shift my eyes to the outgoing to get a mental picture of the reading it already changed.
***** so need two people to read symultaneously.
Frank
Use a digital camera to take a picture of both displays and then you can get a simultaneous reading .
boB
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 191 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 887 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.3K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 424 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 621 Energy Use & Conservation
- 608 Discussion Forums/Café
- 302 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 74 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed