RIP: Nanosolar
RSSfeed
Registered Users Posts: 3,810 ✭✭
It’s official. Nanosolar, the CIGS thin-film solar panel aspirant which produced little but hype and broken promises, is done. Its assets are being auctioned off. This should come as no surprise to GTM readers. We reported on the layoffs, the skeleton crew, and the “restructuring for sale” back in April. If you speak CIGS, then [...]The post RIP: Nanosolar appeared first on Solar Feeds.
go to solarfeeds for the rest of this story>>>>>
More...
go to solarfeeds for the rest of this story>>>>>
More...
Comments
-
Re: RIP: Nanosolar
Definitely a train wreck from the beginning. They did have one major successful product which was media hype, no matter what happened they just kept cranking out PR to con folks into lending them more money. The scary part is that the folks behind this scam have already moved on other companies. -
Re: RIP: Nanosolar
I have been at a few of those VC / Company board meetings before and other startup planning/data gathering from inside the company side--There is a weird split (in my humble opinion) between VC/Upper Management and actual day to day operations.
There was a lot of work/talk based on 1-5 year plans and very little on what was going wrong right now going on. Had a very disconnected / academic quality about the whole thing (maybe too many MS/Phd's involved). 5 year engineering development budgets in a start-up just did not make very much sense.
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
Re: RIP: Nanosolarpeakbagger wrote: »Definitely a train wreck from the beginning. They did have one major successful product which was media hype, no matter what happened they just kept cranking out PR to con folks into lending them more money. The scary part is that the folks behind this scam have already moved on other companies.
-
Re: RIP: Nanosolar
Nothing I could find said they had US Government Loans/Investments... The total investment appears to have been ~$400 to $500 Millon USD.
Here is a blog by the (I think) founding CEO (from 2002-2010?) and his side of the story:
http://blog.rmartinr.com/
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
Re: RIP: NanosolarNothing I could find said they had US Government Loans/Investments... The total investment appears to have been ~$400 to $500 billion USD.
I'm betting you didn't mean to type "billion". -
Re: RIP: Nanosolar
Nope--Intended to type Million dollars... (was thinking 1/2 billion... oh well).
-BillNear San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset -
Re: RIP: Nanosolar
No direct subsidies but I expect there were indirect subsidies floating around. Ultimately its a tax write off for most.
Categories
- All Categories
- 222 Forum & Website
- 130 Solar Forum News and Announcements
- 1.3K Solar News, Reviews, & Product Announcements
- 192 Solar Information links & sources, event announcements
- 887 Solar Product Reviews & Opinions
- 254 Solar Skeptics, Hype, & Scams Corner
- 22.4K Solar Electric Power, Wind Power & Balance of System
- 3.5K General Solar Power Topics
- 6.7K Solar Beginners Corner
- 1K PV Installers Forum - NEC, Wiring, Installation
- 2K Advanced Solar Electric Technical Forum
- 5.5K Off Grid Solar & Battery Systems
- 425 Caravan, Recreational Vehicle, and Marine Power Systems
- 1.1K Grid Tie and Grid Interactive Systems
- 651 Solar Water Pumping
- 815 Wind Power Generation
- 624 Energy Use & Conservation
- 611 Discussion Forums/Café
- 304 In the Weeds--Member's Choice
- 75 Construction
- 124 New Battery Technologies
- 108 Old Battery Tech Discussions
- 3.8K Solar News - Automatic Feed
- 3.8K Solar Energy News RSS Feed