E6 Tarriff wording - what does this mean?

Options
Total bundled service charges are calculated using the total rates below. On-peak, partpeak,
and off-peak usage is assigned to tiers on a pro-rated basis. For example, if
twenty percent of a customer’s usage is in the on-peak period, then twenty percent of
the total usage in each tier will be treated as on-peak usage.
Bundled service
customers are billed the greater of the total minimum charge or the otherwise applicable
total charge derived from total energy rates.

I can't for the life of me figure this out.

Comments

  • BB.
    BB. Super Moderators, Administrators Posts: 33,439 admin
    Options
    Re: E6 Tarriff wording - what does this mean?

    Not a problem--it is very simple to explain (please note, I believe PG&S has reverted to the "2004" method of calculations. The 2005 really messed up Baseline Tiered pricing--but that has been fixed (from an email discussion with PG&E regarding E7 rate plan--E6 should be similar--but more complex because of the extra time period):
    Step-by-Step Analysis:

    1. The pro-rated assignment of on-peak and off-peak usage to tiers
    does not make any difference in the total bill compared to tariffs
    dated before November 1, 2004 in which the Energy Procurement
    Surcharges were calculated separately on the total usage and added
    to base energy charges for each TOU period. This is true so long
    as the difference in rates from one tier to the next is the same
    for each TOU period, as is the case in the current TOU tariffs and
    all the ones we have seen before. An example comparison of these
    calculations is shown below in Appendix I.

    2. Since pro-rating has no effect on the total bill, any proposed
    calculation method can be validated by making sure the result is
    equal to that produced by the method used before November 1, 2004.

    3. We assume that when the current E-7 tariff refers to "customer's
    usage", this means the total net usage shown on the detail bill in
    the TOTALS row of the USAGE (kWH) column of the TOU kWH METER
    INFORMATION table of the detail bill. This is the sum of the
    usages in each TOU period, which will be negative in periods when
    the customer is a net generator and positive in periods when the
    customer is a net consumer.

    4. The tariff for E7 specifies that if twenty percent of a customer's
    usage is in the on-peak period, then twenty percent of the total
    usage in each tier will be treated as on-peak usage and eighty
    percent of the total usage in each tier will be treated as
    off-peak usage. Following this instruction is straightforward:
    The percentage of the customer's usage that is in the on-peak
    period is simply the ratio of on-peak usage to total net usage
    times 100. This percentage will be negative when the customer is
    a net generator in the on-peak period but a net consumer overall.
    This percentage may also be greater than 100, but the sum of the
    percentages for all periods will always be 100. (This ratio
    cannot be calculated when the total net usage is zero; that
    problem is addressed in a later step.)

    5. Calculating a total bill that involves net generation in one TOU
    period and net consumption in another TOU period using the
    percentages as determined in the previous step will produce the
    same total bill as the method used before November 1, 2004, just
    as it does for a customer that is a net consumer in all TOU
    periods. An example comparison of these calculations is shown
    below in Appendix II. This validates the calculation. If some
    future tariff makes the difference in rates from one tier to the
    next not be the same for all TOU periods, the pro-rating to TOU
    periods will still be correct.

    6. The total bill calculated as described in the previous step is the
    same as that produced by the calculations in the PG&E detail bills
    between November 1, 2004 and October, 2005. An example comparison
    of these calculations is shown below in Appendix III. Thus, one
    way to mitigate the problems introduced in October 2005 by the
    change in the method of calculating bills is simply to return to
    the method of calculating bills as used between November 1, 2004
    and October, 2005.

    7. You can avoid the appearance of large baseline values and
    percentages greater than 100% by reformulating the calculation.
    The problem stems from the way the tariff was written. The
    pro-rating is specified by a rule sentence and an example
    sentence:

    Rule: On-peak and off-peak usage is assigned to tiers on a
    pro-rated basis.

    Example: For example, if twenty percent of a customer's usage
    is in the on-peak period, then twenty percent of the
    total usage in each tier will be treated as on-peak usage
    and eighty percent of the total usage in each tier will
    be treated as off-peak usage.

    The example is actually something different than the rule states.
    The rule assigns usage in TOU periods to tiers, whereas the
    example sentence assigns the usage in tiers to TOU periods. A
    better example sentence that correctly characterizes the rule
    would be:

    Example: For example, if eighty percent of a customer's total net
    usage is in tier 1 and the remaining twenty percent is in
    tier 2, then eighty percent of the total usage in each
    TOU period will be treated as tier 1 and twenty percent
    of the usage in each TOU period will be treated as tier 2
    usage.

    The percentage of a customer's total net usage that falls within
    each tier is straightforward to calculate as the ratio of the
    amount in each tier to the total times 100. The result is never
    greater than 100% and is always positive even if the customer is a
    net generator. See Appendix IV for an example showing that a
    calculation based on percentage in tiers produces the same result
    as a calculation based on percentage in TOU periods.

    8. There is an arithmetic difficulty (divide by zero) in calculating
    the percentage used in each TOU period if the kWh generated in the
    on-peak period equals the kWh consumed during the off-peak period
    so the total usage is zero. However, if the calculation of
    charges is based on percentage of usage in each tier, as described
    in the previous step, then this problem can be avoided.

    When calculating the percentage usage in each tier, there is still
    a divide-by-zero problem if the total net usage is zero, but it is
    intuitive in that case to consider all usage to be in tier 1, just
    as it would be for 1 kWh net consumption or -1 kWh net generation.
    So long as the baseline credit per kWh is the same for all TOU
    periods, then the credit in the off-peak period and the debit in
    the on-peak period cancel out. Thus, it makes no difference
    whether the usage is treated as being in tier 1 or tier 2 when the
    total net usage is zero.

    ======================================================================
    Simple--huh...

    Next part has some sample calculations (message too big).

    -Bill
    Near San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset
  • BB.
    BB. Super Moderators, Administrators Posts: 33,439 admin
    Options
    Re: E6 Tarriff wording - what does this mean?

    Part two of E7 calculations:

    ======================================================================
    Appendix I:

    Comparison of calculations before and after November 1, 2004
    (before pro-rating and after). Because the difference in rates
    from one tier to the next is the same for each TOU period, the
    result is the same for both methods.

    E-7 tariff as of March 1, 2006:

    Delta from Tier2
    Summer Peak Off-peak Peak Off-Peak
    Tier 1 0.29372 0.08664 0 0
    Tier 2 0.29372 0.08664 0 0
    Tier 3 0.38171 0.17463 0.08799 0.08799
    Tier 4 0.46303 0.25595 0.16931 0.16931
    Tier 5 0.50565 0.29857 0.21193 0.21193

    Delta from Tier2
    Winter Peak Off-peak Peak Off-Peak
    Tier 1 0.11472 0.08966 0 0
    Tier 2 0.11472 0.08966 0 0
    Tier 3 0.20271 0.17765 0.08799 0.08799
    Tier 4 0.28403 0.25897 0.16931 0.16931
    Tier 5 0.32665 0.30159 0.21193 0.21193

    Baseline Credit 0.01559 0.01559

    Sample bill calculation with net consumption in both on-peak and
    off-peak periods. For simplicity, assume the baseline allocation
    is 100 kWh and that 200 kWh is consumed, with 20% in the on-peak
    period.

    40 kWh on-peak
    160 kWh off-peak

    100 kWh tier 1
    30 kWh tier 2
    70 kWh tier 3

    Calculation before November 1, 2004:

    40 * 0.29372 = $11.75 On-peak charges
    160 * 0.08664 = $13.86 Off-Peak charges
    100 * -0.01559 = $-1.56 Baseline credit
    70 * 0.08799 = $6.16 Tier 3 surcharge
    $30.21 Total

    Calculation after November 1, 2004:

    20% * 100 * 0.29372 = $5.87 On-peak tier 1
    20% * 30 * 0.29372 = $1.76 On-peak tier 2
    20% * 70 * 0.38171 = $5.34 On-peak tier 3
    20% * 100 * -0.01559 = $-0.31 On-peak baseline credit

    80% * 100 * 0.08664 = $6.93 Off-peak tier 1
    80% * 30 * 0.08664 = $2.08 Off-peak tier 2
    80% * 70 * 0.17463 = $9.78 Off-peak tier 3
    80% * 100 * -0.01559 = $-1.25 Off-peak baseline credit
    $30.21 Total


    Appendix II:

    Comparison of calculations before and after November 1, 2004
    (before pro-rating and after) for a bill that involves net
    generation in one TOU period and net consumption in another TOU
    period. Assume the customer generates -100 kWh in the on-peak
    period and consumes 300 kWh in the off-peak period, so the
    customer's total usage is 200 kWh, and assume the baseline
    allocation is 100 kWh.

    -100 kWh on-peak
    300 kWh off-peak
    200 kWh net usage

    100 kWh tier 1
    30 kWh tier 2
    70 kWh tier 3

    Calculation before November 1, 2004:

    -100 * 0.29372 = $-29.37 On-peak charges
    300 * 0.08664 = $25.99 Off-Peak charges
    100 * -0.01559 = $-1.56 Baseline credit
    70 * 0.08799 = $6.16 Tier 3 surcharge
    $1.22 Total

    Calculation after November 1, 2004:

    The percentage of the customer's usage in the on-peak
    and off-peak periods is:

    -100 / 200 = -50% On-peak
    300 / 200 = 150% Off-peak
    100% Total

    -50% * 100 * 0.29372 = $-14.69 On-peak tier 1
    -50% * 30 * 0.29372 = $-4.41 On-peak tier 2
    -50% * 70 * 0.38171 = $-13.36 On-peak tier 3
    -50% * 100 * -0.01559 = $0.78 On-peak baseline debit

    150% * 100 * 0.08664 = $13.00 Off-peak tier 1
    150% * 30 * 0.08664 = $3.90 Off-peak tier 2
    150% * 70 * 0.17463 = $18.34 Off-peak tier 3
    150% * 100 * -0.01559 = $-2.34 Off-peak baseline credit
    $1.22 Total


    Appendix III:

    Comparison of baseline energy charges calculation from the detail
    bill for account PVV 18 31805 for June 15, 2005 to July 15, 2005
    with a calculation based on percentage of usage in each TOU period
    as in Appendix II. This account is on rate schedule E-9, with a
    baseline allowance of 366 kWh.

    Reduced representation of BASELINE ENERGY CHARGES table:

    Desc. TOU Usage Base qty Tiered qty Rate Charge
    Tier 1 Peak -62 -810.429 -62 0.28368 $-17.59
    Tier 1 Part -101 -1320.214 -101 0.10395 $-10.50
    Tier 1 Off 191 2496.643 191 0.04965 $9.48
    TOTALS 28 $-18.61

    Calculation based on percentage of usage in each TOU period:

    -62/28 = -221.4% On-peak
    -101/28 = -360.7% Partial-peak
    191/28 = 682.1% Off-peak

    -221.4% * 28 * 0.28368 = $-17.59 On-peak tier 1
    -360.7% * 28 * 0.10395 = $-10.50 Partial-peak tier 1
    682.1% * 28 * 0.04965 = $9.48 Off-peak tier 1
    $-18.61 Total


    Appendix IV:

    Example showing that a calculation based on percentage in tiers
    produces the same result as a calculation based on percentage in
    TOU periods. As in Appendix II, assume the customer generates
    -100 kWh in the on-peak period and consumes 300 kWh in the
    off-peak period, so the customer's total usage is 200 kWh, and
    assume the baseline allocation is 100 kWh.

    -100 kWh on-peak
    300 kWh off-peak
    200 kWh net usage

    100 kWh tier 1
    30 kWh tier 2
    70 kWh tier 3
    200 kWh total usage

    Calculation based on percentage of usage in each TOU period:

    -100 / 200 = -50% On-peak
    300 / 200 = 150% Off-peak
    100% Total

    -50% * 100 * 0.29372 = $-14.69 On-peak tier 1
    -50% * 30 * 0.29372 = $-4.41 On-peak tier 2
    -50% * 70 * 0.38171 = $-13.36 On-peak tier 3
    -50% * 100 * -0.01559 = $0.78 On-peak baseline debit

    150% * 100 * 0.08664 = $13.00 Off-peak tier 1
    150% * 30 * 0.08664 = $3.90 Off-peak tier 2
    150% * 70 * 0.17463 = $18.34 Off-peak tier 3
    150% * 100 * -0.01559 = $-2.34 Off-peak baseline credit
    $1.22 Total

    Calculation based on percentage of usage in each tier:

    100 / 200 = 50% Tier 1
    30 / 200 = 15% Tier 2
    70 / 200 = 35% Tier 3
    100% Total

    50% * -100 * 0.29372 = $-14.69 On-peak tier 1
    15% * -100 * 0.29372 = $-4.41 On-peak tier 2
    35% * -100 * 0.38171 = $-13.36 On-peak tier 3
    50% * -100 * -0.01559 = $0.78 On-peak baseline debit

    50% * 300 * 0.08664 = $13.00 Off-peak tier 1
    15% * 300 * 0.08664 = $3.90 Off-peak tier 2
    35% * 300 * 0.17463 = $18.34 Off-peak tier 3
    50% * 300 * -0.01559 = $-2.34 Off-peak baseline credit
    $1.22 Total

    The calculations above are equivalent as shown by simple algebra.
    Given:

    U = total net usage
    P = on-peak usage
    T = tier 1 usage
    R = on-peak tier 1 rate

    Then for the on-peak tier 1 charge calculation (the first line in
    each of the two calculations), we have:

    On-peak tier 1 = P/U * T * R (% in peak)
    = T/U * P * R (% in tier 1)

    ======================================================================
    I left off the names--I don't know the folks but I do want to acknowledge the good fight they had with PG&E back in 2005 to fix up their TOU rate plans.

    -Bill

    For extra credit, program into an Excel spreadsheet using variables for tiers, rates, and kWhr readings.

    -BB
    Near San Francisco California: 3.5kWatt Grid Tied Solar power system+small backup genset